<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ink Grass &#187; Web Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inkgrass.lazymoon.org/category/web-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inkgrass.lazymoon.org</link>
	<description>A blog about web design, programming, graphics and everything inbetween.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:13:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Reducing JPEG Sizes For The Web</title>
		<link>http://inkgrass.lazymoon.org/2007/12/26/reducing-jpeg-sizes-for-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://inkgrass.lazymoon.org/2007/12/26/reducing-jpeg-sizes-for-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 02:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lachlan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inkgrass.lazymoon.org/2007/12/26/reducing-jpeg-sizes-for-the-web/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reducing bandwidth usage is obviously a priority of web developers.  Images are one of the common culprits of bandwidth usage. It goes without saying that the more kilobytes we can save, the less money we have to pay to keep out site on the net.
This is when the little known utility developed by David [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reducing bandwidth usage is obviously a priority of web developers.  Images are one of the common culprits of bandwidth usage. It goes without saying that the more kilobytes we can save, the less money we have to pay to keep out site on the net.</p>
<p>This is when the little known utility developed by <a href="http://davidcrowell.com/">David Crowell</a> named <a href="http://davidcrowell.com/archive/2007/03/11/jStrip.aspx"><em>jStrip</em></a> comes in handy. jStrip removes optional data chunks, such as Exif Data or Photoshop thumbnails, from the JPEG&#8217;s. By doing so it usually shaves around a half-dozen kilobytes off of the image size.</p>
<p>I originally began using jStrip to prevent an incident similar to what happened to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_Schwartz">Cat Schwartz</a> in 2003. Whilst you won&#8217;t catch me naked in any of my Exif thumbnails, there is obviously a bit of risk associated in uploading images straight from your image-editing software to your website.</p>
<p>For that matter, jStrip is a great tool for removing unexpected materials and reducing file-size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inkgrass.lazymoon.org/2007/12/26/reducing-jpeg-sizes-for-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
